Technical issues have been playing a relevant role in forensic practice and represent an important aid to those who administer Justice. The typical engineering methods represent a large part of the forensic sciences, and technical experts’ role has steadily gained importance in the last decades.
Justice has always sought certain means to assess the factual truth to render fair verdicts. To the investigators and triers of facts, science and techniques appear like the optimal tools to provide a certain representation of facts, based on scientific and irrefutable data.
Unfortunately, science and technique have their own limitations and they can only provide limited information on the events they model. This means that every decision taken based on a scientific judgment of facts has an intrinsic risk of being not fully correct, and it is important, from both the technical and ethical points of view, to consider such limitations.
The objective of this course is to frame the role of the technical experts inside the judicial proceedings and explain how the implicit doubts in the result of every piece of evidence collected through scientific and technical activities shall be quantified and presented to the triers of facts to explain them the risk of a wrong decision.
In this respect, forensic metrology is the branch of forensic science capable of providing a pondered answer to these issues not hiding the important, implicit limits of every technical assessment of the facts to the triers of facts, thus avoiding ethical and penal implications and will be covered by this course.